Barbecue season is upon us, and I’m wondering about the greenest method for cooking up my legendary T-bones and sweet sausages. Should I stick with charcoal, which I’ve used for years, or should I finally make the switch to gas?
If you’re concerned solely with the carbon dioxide that wafts off your grill, then gas is the easy choice. But if you step back and consider the whole production cycle, then certain types of charcoal may well be the greener cooking fuel. The real trick, as is so often the case, is to select a product that’s been created conscientiously—a tough assignment, given how little information manufacturers typically provide.
Attu
June 26th, 2008 at 17:50
Charcoal is mandatory for me. I can’t do without that smell. Otherwise it’s just cooking outdoors.
Michael Angel
June 26th, 2008 at 21:53
Charcoal produced by pyrolysis from wood waste or renewable bamboo is possibly the greenest.
You could also eat kangaroo rather than cow. Kangaroos produce no methane.
Some info on char production methods here.
http://hypography.com/forums/terra-preta.html
Gudunga
June 27th, 2008 at 00:11
Had the same issue, found the ULTIMATE SOLUTION. Aussie grills have a cheap, dual grill. Does gas, does coal. When I want seared steaks, lump hardwood coal does the trick, want a quick meal? Gas.
Its Awesome.